Eu Copyright Law: Is The Reda Study A Leap Forrard For The Parody Exception?
November 27, 2018
Edit
While the written report rightly urges for an ever-increasing ‘internet-friendly copyright law’, the written report powerfulness get got gone also far inwards relation to parodies. Article 5.3(k) of the InfoSoc Directive currently provides the possibility for European Union Member US to innovate a parody exception for the purposes of parody, pastiche as well as caricature to the exclusive correct of reproduction inwards their national copyright laws (this chance was seized past times the Great Britain which forthwith includes a parody exception inwards section 30A CDPA). This provision was interpreted past times the Court of Justice of the European Union inwards the Deckmyn case, guiding national courts inwards their application of the exception to particular facts (for comments on this determination consider here as well as the AG’s persuasion consider surprisingly extreme’ as well as fifty-fifty beingness ‘inacceptable’, this written report attracted widespread involvement as well as statements of back upwardly from different digital rights organisations.
While the written report rightly urges for an ever-increasing ‘internet-friendly copyright law’, the written report powerfulness get got gone also far inwards relation to parodies. Article 5.3(k) of the InfoSoc Directive currently provides the possibility for European Union Member US to innovate a parody exception for the purposes of parody, pastiche as well as caricature to the exclusive correct of reproduction inwards their national copyright laws (this chance was seized past times the Great Britain which forthwith includes a parody exception inwards section 30A CDPA). This provision was interpreted past times the Court of Justice of the European Union inwards the Deckmyn case, guiding national courts inwards their application of the exception to particular facts (for comments on this determination consider here).
Baca Juga
At 17 on page half dozen of the report, Julia Reda suggests ‘that the exception for caricature, parody as well as pastiche should apply regardless of the job of the parodic use’. Without farther explanations, such a broad exception raises concerns.
The parody exception is an exception to the right-holder’s exclusive correct of reproduction. As such, international treaties dependent area it to the application of the three-step exam (Berne Convention art. 9(2), TRIPS Agreement arts. 9(1) as well as 13; and, WCT arts. 1(4) as well as 10). This exam requires whatever exceptions inwards national legislation to go limited to ‘certain special cases, provided that such reproduction does non conflict amongst a normal exploitation of the go as well as does non unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the author’. The French authorities’ answer appropriately expresses concerns that a parody exception applicable exterior whatever job of parody is unlikely to consider the root measurement of ‘certain special cases’. As this requirement way that a shapeless provision exempting broad serial of uses should non go tolerable as well as reflects the ask for legislators to reconcile opposing interests.
The exception for the job of parody, caricature or pastiche aims to render the possibility for parodists to re-create copyrighted plant inwards limited circumstances. The electrical current parody exception is the result of a compromise inwards low-cal of the objectives underlying the exception. The number opposes the interests of right-holders (who are entitled to go rewarded for their creation) against the involvement of the users (who ask to reproduce prior plant to create the novel work). Removing its job is probable to amount to a shapeless exception rebuffed past times international obligations.
Yet, La Quadrature du Net interprets Julia Reda’s proposal as: ‘to acknowledge the parody exception for non-humorous creations’. If this is her aim, this could go achieved through the electrical current wording of the exception for the job of parody.
The Court of Justice of the European Union has defined ‘parody’ through its requirements inwards Deckmyn. At para 20, the Court notes that a parody needs: ‘to evoke an existing go spell beingness noticeably different from it, and, secondly, to constitute an appear of humour or mockery’.
The appear of humour or mockery does non exclude the appear of criticisms. By requiring the parodist to get got a humorous intent, it is suggested that a broad interpretation should prevail equally to include playful, homage or serious expressions (a glimpse at French example constabulary which knows a long history of the application of the parody exception shows evidence of serious expressions as well as the inclusion of satire). The bound beingness that the appear should refrain from beingness prejudicial to the someone of the writer or his work(s). The failure to consider this requirement enables the right-holder to enforce his or her moral rights (especially the integrity right). Additionally, where an private is defamed, this someone tin give the axe convey an activity nether defamation law.
Also, the main justification to the introduction of a parody exception is to facilitate the practise of one’s liberty of expression. While liberty of appear is already considered inwards the electrical current InfoSoc Directive (Recital 3 reads: ‘The proposed harmonisation volition assistance to implement the 4 freedoms of the internal marketplace as well as relates to compliance amongst the telephone commutation principles of constabulary as well as peculiarly of property, including intellectual property, as well as liberty of appear as well as the populace interest.’) as well as the interpretation of the parody exception inwards Deckmyn (at para 25), the written report (recitals C as well as D) confirms the importance of the human relationship betwixt copyright as well as related rights as well as liberty of appear both protected nether the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (respectively enshrined inwards article 17(2) as well as 11).
Yet, the concerns expressed past times Julia Reda concerning the likelihood of achieving harmonisation of the exceptions throughout the European Union territory nether the electrical current InfoSoc Directive (at 10) are shared. Additionally, her wishing to brand copyright exceptions mandatory is welcomed (at 11) as well as would sure contribute to the objective of harmonisation desired.
To conclude, it must go reminded that this written report is but a draft. This i volition forthwith go handed over to the Legal Affairs Committee and to the Internal Market and Culture committees. Overall, the written report makes of import proposals but at that spot is yet room for improvement. Against this backdrop, aid must go taken regarding the details of each provision such equally for the parody exception to ensure that the touching on of the exception applicable exterior parody uses does non disrupt the residue desired betwixt the interests of right-holders as well as parodists.
