Brexit: Unopen To Conceptual Clarifications Concerning Efta As Well As The Eea
November 21, 2018
Edit
Dr. Michael Sánchez Rydelski together with Cath Howdle*
*Respectively Member together with Deputy Director of the Legal Service of the EFTA Surveillance Authority. Nothing inward the introduce article binds or necessarily reflects the views of the EFTA Surveillance Authority.
1. Introduction
This contribution does non intend to offering a solution to the Brexit conundrum: that is a affair for governments together with negotiation teams. The next comments are simply intended to serve equally a guide to roughly of the to a greater extent than of import aspects of the European Free Trade Association (“EFTA”) together with the European Economic Area (“EEA”).
In the introduce contribution, nosotros aim to explicate briefly what EFTA or EFTA-EEA membership may offering the U.K. (“UK”), to clarify the human relationship betwixt EFTA together with the EEA, to articulate how each selection mightiness last exercised, together with to debunk a few misconceptions that take away hold been doing the rounds.
2. The approaching vacuum
Once the transitional flow ends, the UK’s definitive move out from the European Union (“EU”) volition create a vacuum, inward price of preferential merchandise together with marketplace access arrangements amongst the UK’s electrical flow trading partners. It is ordinarily understood that at the signal of its final departure, the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland volition lose its preferential marketplace access to the EU’s Single Market, unless an scheme tin last agreed. However, what is less ordinarily articulated is the consideration that the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland volition simultaneously uncovering itself empty-handed concerning merchandise amongst its non-EU partners, equally it volition also lose its participation inward a number of complimentary merchandise arrangements the European Union has concluded amongst tertiary countries, such equally Canada, Singapore together with South Korea.
How the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland volition create total this vacuum is silent unknown. However, it is already clear that in conclusion a novel complimentary merchandise understanding amongst the EU, patch negotiating complimentary merchandise agreements amongst non-EU partners, volition last a time-consuming together with resource-intensive exercise. No serious predictions tin last made equally to how long it volition take away to finalise - permit lonely ratify - these arrangements, but it is obvious that this volition non last a quick fix.
In addition, the processes of negotiating a novel human relationship amongst the European Union together with a whole host of novel arrangements amongst non-EU partners volition last intertwined. Non-EU partners mightiness last reluctant to finalise merchandise arrangements amongst the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland until the seat betwixt the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland together with the European Union has been sorted out. This physical care for volition last probable to take away hold a negative touching on on the UK’s economical development.
3. Existing models
Given this dilemma, the legitimate inquiry needs to last raised whether existing models could last used to overcome this doubt inward the brusk to mid-term perspective.
Two ideas for the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland take away hold been raised over the course of written report of the in conclusion few months:
- to re-join EFTA equally a way of maintaining at to the lowest degree complimentary merchandise amongst non-EU partners, patch ceasing to last a political party to the EEA Agreement (“the EFTA option”); or
- to re-join EFTA patch remaining a political party to the EEA Agreement (“the EFTA-EEA option”).
4. The EFTA option
4.1. What would the EFTA selection await like?
EFTA is an intergovernmental merchandise organisation comprising 4 Member States, namely Iceland, Liechtenstein, Kingdom of Norway together with Switzerland. The United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland was a founding fellow member of EFTA inward 1960,[i] earlier leaving inward 1973 to bring together the together with hence European Community. EFTA functions on the legal footing of the EFTA Convention, which promotes complimentary merchandise betwixt its existing 4 EFTA US (intra-EFTA trade).[ii] EFTA is also a platform for an extensive network of complimentary merchandise arrangements betwixt the EFTA US together with tertiary countries.
There are roughly of import factors to consider amongst regard to the EFTA option:
First, EFTA membership is not based upon joining a customs spousal human relationship or unmarried market. Foreign merchandise policy remains at national level. The EFTA Convention established a complimentary merchandise area, non a customs union.
Second, the UK’s EFTA membership could last envisaged without participation inward the EU’s Single Market. EFTA is a classical international merchandise organisation together with membership of EFTA does non hateful having to stay a political party to the EEA Agreement.
Third, dissimilar the EU, EFTA does non envisage political integration. There is no chemical component of “ever closer political union” inward the EFTA Convention, the focus is on economical integration. Nor is at that topographic point a straight machinery for incorporating European Union rules into the EFTA Convention.
Fourth, EFTA does non found whatsoever supranational institutions: at that topographic point is no specific EFTA compliance machinery or court. Chapter 17 of the EFTA Convention, entitled “Consultations together with Dispute Settlement”, provides for a dispute village machinery to bargain amongst whatsoever matters of contention arising from the Convention. This enforcement machinery follows a classical arbitration approach, distinguishable both from the judicial procedures available nether EU/EEA police together with from the to a greater extent than judicial dispute village physical care for nether WTO rules.
Any novel EFTA membership would entail the acceding State applying to also larn a political party to the Free Trade Agreements (“FTAs”) EFTA has negotiated amongst tertiary countries. EFTA has currently a network of 27 concluded FTAs, roofing 38 countries, which comprehend substantially similar areas equally those of the EFTA Convention.[iii] Among these 27 FTAs are trading partners such equally Canada, Chile, Colombia, Hong Kong, South Korea, Mexico, Morocco, Peru, Philippines, Singapore, the Southern African Customs Union, Tunisia, Turkey together with the Ukraine.
The term “FTAs” needs to last qualified, equally EFTA equally such is non a political party to these agreements. The Contracting Parties to an FTA are the EFTA US on the 1 side together with the partner reason on the other, since unusual merchandise policy remains inside the competence of the EFTA States.[iv] The United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland would consequently last complimentary to negotiate its ain bilateral FTAs. Still, negotiating futurity marketplace access inward a grouping amongst 4 other economically successful countries enhances the scaling termination together with volition supply to a greater extent than weight inward negotiations.
Finally, EFTA also deals amongst the human relationship betwixt roughly EFTA States, namely Iceland, Principality of Liechtenstein together with Norway, together with the European Union past times way of the EEA Agreement, through which these EFTA US participate inward the EU’s Single Market.[v] Consequently, EFTA membership would also leave of absence the door opened upward to consider after possible EEA membership.
4.2. How could the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland take away the EFTA option?
The physical care for for re-joining EFTA is non highly formalistic. EFTA membership is open. Article 56(1) of the EFTA Convention provides for the possibility for other US to accede to it. The EFTA Convention does non contain whatsoever specific weather condition for accession. The price of accession would last determined inward the negotiations amongst the applying State. Upon completion of these negotiations, the EFTA Council[vi] would take away a conclusion approbation the accession, setting out the price together with weather condition thereof. The EFTA Convention would come inward into forcefulness inward relation to an acceding State on the appointment stipulated inward an EFTA Council decision.[vii]
5. The EFTA-EEA option
5.1. What would the EFTA-EEA selection await like?
The EEA Agreement was signed inward 1992 together with came into forcefulness inward 1994. This is an understanding betwixt the European Union together with its Member States, on the 1 hand, together with 3 EFTA States, namely Iceland, Principality of Liechtenstein together with Kingdom of Norway (“EFTA-EEA States”), on the other. The United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland is a signatory to the EEA Agreement equally a fellow member of the EU. Switzerland, the 4th EFTA State, is non a Contracting Party to the EEA Agreement. The human relationship betwixt Switzerland together with the European Union is based upon a serial of bilateral agreements.
There are 3 of import factors to consider regarding the EFTA-EEA option:
First, the EEA Agreement does non found a customs spousal human relationship but it does laid upward a unmarried market. The EEA Agreement aims to ensure a balanced playing land betwixt the European Union Member US together with the EFTA-EEA US through provisions on complimentary induce of goods together with capital, liberty of establishment together with liberty to supply services. It also sets out State assistance together with contest police parallel to the EU’s rules. If the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland were to larn an EFTA-EEA State, it would non last prevented from making a customs scheme amongst the EU.
Second, the EEA unmarried marketplace is to a greater extent than express than the European Union Single Market. It is express inward price of the textile orbit of what it covers – for example, it does non comprehend fisheries together with agriculture, or VAT. There is no “EEA citizenship” – this is non a component subdivision of European Union police which is reflected inward the EEA. Similarly, at that topographic point is no Charter of Fundamental Rights, together with no requirement for a State which is political party to the EEA Agreement to also last a fellow member of the European Convention on Human Rights (although all 31 US are parties to the ECHR, together with the EFTA Court has made reference to human rights). Nor does the EEA Agreement comprehend whatsoever of the judge together with abode affairs parts of the European Union Single Market (so no European Arrest Warrant, for example). However, EFTA-EEA US take away hold the possibility to “opt in” past times understanding to initiatives inward the surface area of freedom, judge together with security, or tin conclude treaties amongst the European Union based on these arrangements, which are dissever from the EEA. While every EFTA State participates inward the EU’s Schengen system, this is also legally dissever from the EEA.
Third, the EEA ensures access to the European Union Single Market based on regulatory alignment and is self-policing.
The EFTA-EEA US tin access the unmarried marketplace if they adhere to the rules laid about inward the EEA Agreement, together with if their regulations are aligned amongst those inward the EU. The chosen machinery for doing hence is to contain European Union regulations together with directives into the annexes to the EEA Agreement, together with and hence to brand those regulations together with directives component subdivision of national police inward the EFTA-EEA States.
This is a model of regulatory alignment which is non a 1 chiliad m miles away from the electrical flow proposal for a UK/EU transitional agreement.[viii] The EFTA-EEA model has 2 advantages over this proposal. First, the EFTA-EEA US tin participate inward the preparatory stages of the European Union legislative physical care for (a vocalisation which would last louder if the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland were component subdivision of the EFTA-EEA bloc). Second, the physical care for of incorporation of a slice of European Union legislation into the EEA Agreement’s annexes comes amongst the chance to negotiate adaptation texts. Furthermore, the EFTA-EEA US tin also notify “constitutional requirements” (notably a vote inward the national parliament) earlier accepting a slice of European Union secondary legislation into the annexes to the EEA Agreement. This, however, tin create delays inward ensuring total regulatory alignment – equally nosotros take away hold seen inward the fiscal services sector.
In ensuring compliance amongst the EEA Agreement, the EFTA-EEA US take away hold established 2 independent bodies; the EFTA Surveillance Authority (“ESA”) together with the EFTA Court. ESA monitors the EFTA-EEA States’ implementation together with application of the EEA Agreement together with all regulations together with directives inward the annexes. If the EFTA-EEA State has non met its obligations, it tin last brought earlier the EFTA Court. The EFTA Court also delivers judgments inward cases brought against ESA decisions, together with delivers judgments interpreting EEA police (known equally advisory opinions) inward cases which are referred from national courts.
Readers who are familiar amongst the European Union scheme of monitoring together with oversight volition non uncovering the EEA scheme wholly unfamiliar. There are, however, 3 of import differences. First, at that topographic point is no possibility for ESA to obtain penal damages against an EFTA-EEA State which continues to infringe EEA police after an EFTA Court judgment against it. Instead the affair is resolved past times recourse to the Joint Committee of the EEA (comprising representatives from the EFTA-EEA US together with from the EU). Second, advisory opinions are non-binding together with leave of absence the referring courtroom complimentary to follow a different course of written report of activeness inward reaching a judgment (subject to the rules on loyal cooperation, together with the potential for follow-up activeness from ESA if the judgment leads to an infringement of EEA law). Third, the EFTA Court cannot annul legislation.
It is worth noting that the compliance scheme established past times the EEA is rather unique inward price of its set-up equally an international police compliance system, inward 2 respects.
First, dissimilar the classical model of dispute resolution for international agreements (involving a tripartite tribunal of 1 individual appointed past times each side together with a neutral arbiter) the EEA model is self-policing. The EFTA-EEA US each nominate a College fellow member to Pb ESA (which is an independent organisation charged amongst ensuring compliance) together with each nominate a approximate to sit down on the EFTA Court. The appointments are made past times the EFTA-EEA US jointly: at that topographic point is no European Union involvement. Nor is at that topographic point an European Union appointee or representative inward ESA or on the EFTA Court bench.
The absence of an European Union approximate is compensated for past times the regulation of homogeneity; which provides that at that topographic point should last a grade playing land across the 2 parts of the EEA (in the European Union together with inward the EFTA –EEA States). However, this does non hateful that the EFTA Court ever follows the CJEU: the CJEU has also followed the EFTA Court. There is also extensive judicial dialogue betwixt the 2 courts. Moreover, representatives from the EFTA-EEA US together with ESA are entitled to last heard inward cases earlier the CJEU (and vice versa). This scheme would create goodness the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland inward that it would non lose its vocalisation when European Union rules are interpreted past times the CJEU (with an obvious knock-on touching on inward situations of regulatory alignment).
Certain commentators take away hold suggested that the CJEU is able to overrule the EFTA Court inward the lawsuit of disagreement. However, this is non the case: if at that topographic point is a serious together with sustained difference inward the case-law (which at that topographic point never has been, despite roughly differences inward interpretation), the Joint Committee may last convened to bargain amongst this number (which it never has been) together with if it fails to accomplish an understanding on an interpretation of EEA law, it may take away to refer a affair to the CJEU for interpretation. This does non amount to an powerfulness for the CJEU to overrule the EFTA Court.
The minute honour inward which the EEA compliance scheme differs from the classical international model is that it is non simply state-to-state dispute resolution. The scheme of preliminary references established inward the European Union (which permits citizens to practice their rights to a greater extent than effectively) is mirrored inward the advisory opinions physical care for at the EFTA Court: an ordinary individual or draw of piece of employment organisation tin take away a instance earlier a national court, together with if a inquiry of interpretation of EEA police arises together with hence it tin last answered past times the EFTA Court (instead of the same citizen or draw of piece of employment organisation having to travail to take away their reason to judge earlier an international tribunal for an wrong interpretation, or to rely on a state-to-state action).
Similarly, ESA’s compliance activities are triggered past times complaints together with ESA has extensive contact amongst citizens, businesses together with NGOs, inward lodge to ensure that people who derive rights from EEA police tin take away payoff of those rights. Likewise, interested parties tin take away cases earlier the EFTA Court inward the lawsuit that they consider an ESA conclusion to last ill-founded. This is a scheme which does non simply leave of absence dispute resolution inward the hands of a province versus province court, but brings citizens into the moving painting inward the practice of rights granted nether law.
5.2. How could the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland take away the EFTA-EEA option?
The United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland is already a political party to the EEA Agreement, equally 1 of the European Union Member States, together with hence would take away the EEA selection past times becoming an EFTA-EEA State.
It would last impossible for the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland to stay equally a “floating” state: the EEA Agreement’s articles refer repeatedly to the European Union Member US on 1 manus together with the EFTA-EEA US on the other. However, if the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland became an EFTA-EEA State, together with hence exclusively the preamble together with Article 126 EEA (plus roughly of the protocols together with annexes) would require pregnant amendment. Such amendments would require the understanding of the other thirty EEA States.
6. Conclusion
It is amongst roughly surprise that the authors banking company annotation that political fence inward the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland has non yet reached a draw of piece of employment solid conclusion equally to what the EU-UK arrangements should last at the halt of the transitional period. It is hoped that the introduce banking company annotation at to the lowest degree helps to clarify 2 of the possible options.
Brussels, thirteen June 2018
Barnard together with Peers: chapter 27
Photo credit: www.cruise-norway.no
[i] The negotiations on the establishment of EFTA were concluded amongst the signing of the EFTA Convention inward Stockholm on 4 Jan 1960.
[ii] The EFTA Convention establishing EFTA is available at: www.efta.int
[iii] An overview of all concluded FTAs is available at: www.efta.int
[iv] EFTA US are inward regulation complimentary to conclude unilaterally FTAs amongst tertiary countries.
[v] Whereas the trading human relationship betwixt Switzerland together with the European Union is based on serial of bilateral agreements.
[vi] The EFTA Council is the highest governing trunk of EFTA amongst responsibleness for all matters concerning the relations betwixt the EFTA US together with betwixt EFTA together with tertiary countries (Article 43 of the EFTA Convention).
[vii] Article 56(1), tertiary sentence, of the EFTA Convention.