The Novel Eu Police Delineate On Refugees Takes Shape: To A Greater Extent Than Harmonisation Simply Less Protection?

Professor Steve Peers

At the pump of the contested number of asylum inward the European Union – including the electrical flow perceived ‘refugee/migrant crisis’ – is the definition of who is a ‘refugee’, or is at to the lowest degree entitled instead to a shape of ‘subsidiary protection’ for those fleeing threats of ‘serious harm’. Refugees in addition to people amongst subsidiary protection have to a greater extent than legal protection in addition to status than many other non-EU citizens, inward especial irregular migrants.

Unsurprisingly then, the proposed revision of the European Union legislation on this number forms business office of the broader overhaul of all European Union asylum laws proposed inward 2016, equally a answer to the perceived crisis. Recently the European Union governments agreed their position on the proposal, which must at i time go negotiated amongst the European Parliament (its negotiating seat is laid out here).

Most of the other 2016 proposals are soundless nether negotiation (I’ll verbalize over them equally business office of an update of recent European Union immigration in addition to asylum developments, coming soon). But since the ‘qualification’ rules are a cornerstone of European Union asylum law, the latest evolution calls for a to a greater extent than in-depth analysis. In particular, volition the novel police push clit run across the Commission’s objectives for dealing amongst the ‘crisis’: more harmonisation, an overall reduction inward protection standards, in addition to deterrents for ‘secondary’ movements betwixt Member States?

The proposal aims to implement the UN Refugee Convention (which the European Union refers to equally the ‘Geneva Convention’) inward to a greater extent than detail, equally regards both the definition of ‘refugee’ in addition to the rights which refugees receive. It besides defines ‘subsidiary protection’ in addition to sets out the rights which subsidiary protection beneficiaries are entitled to.

It volition supersede the existing European Union police push clit on the subject. As business office of the ‘first phase’ of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS), an initial Qualification Directive was adopted inward 2004. Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 ‘second phase’ Qualification Directive replaced it inward 2011. (I analysed the negotiation of the latter Directive here; there’s besides a lengthy analysis of it past times Madeline Garlick in addition to Violeta Moreno Lax inward EU Immigration in addition to Asylum Law: Text in addition to Commentary). The United Kingdom of Great Britain in addition to Northern Ireland of Britain in addition to Northern Republic of Ireland in addition to Republic of Ireland opted inward to (and are soundless jump by) the start stage Directive, but non the minute stage Directive or the 2016 proposal; Kingdom of Denmark is non jump past times whatever of them. After Brexit, United Kingdom of Great Britain in addition to Northern Ireland of Britain in addition to Northern Republic of Ireland citizens volition go able to apply for asylum inward the EU.

Basic legal framework

To give effect to the objective of farther harmonisation, the 2016 proposal volition supersede the 2011 Directive amongst a Regulation, amongst the trial that European Union police push clit on this discipline volition go direct applicable, rather than applying through the medium of national legislation giving effect to a Directive. To the same end, the Regulation volition besides eliminate Member States’ ability inward the electrical flow police push clit to laid to a greater extent than favourable standards equally long equally they are compatible amongst the Directive – although this ability has already been curtailed past times the ECJ’s judgments inward B in addition to D in addition to M’Bodj (the latter ruling is discussed proposal on resettlement is agreed. It volition at i time go mandatory, non optional, for the original burden of proof to residual upon the applicant to present why the claim for refugee or subsidiary protection status is justified; in addition to a novel clause inward the preamble volition reverberate the ECJ’s 2014 instance police push clit (discussed here). The novel Regulation volition reverberate that instance law, past times noting that Member US are complimentary to retain or constitute a split upward status of humanitarian protection, equally long equally at that topographic point is no confusion amongst the (EU harmonised) notions of refugee or subsidiary protection status.

This shift toward harmonisation is besides manifested past times a removal of close options nether the Directive, amongst the effect of lowering standards overall, since close of the options are possibilities for Member US to offering less protection than nether the criterion rules. On the other hand, the Commission’s wishing to possess got the novel police push clit play a role inward immediate ‘crisis management’ would go thwarted past times Member States, who wishing the police push clit to apply inward 2 years’ fourth dimension – rather than the 6 months desired past times the Commission. (Note that the EP wants it to apply fifty-fifty to a greater extent than chop-chop than the Commission, though).

Turning to the details of the proposal, at that topographic point are iv original elements to the law: mutual rules (applying to both refugee in addition to subsidiary protection status); the definition of ‘refugee’; the definition of subsidiary protection; in addition to the content of status (ie the benefits people amongst status receive).

Common rules

Family members of refugees in addition to people amongst subsidiary protection volition go given extra rights inward the novel police push clit (see below), in addition to they volition go defined slightly to a greater extent than broadly. Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 ‘family member’ volition at i time include relationships formed exterior the province of refuge, non merely those formed within the province or origin. This means, for instance, that the husband of a Syrian refugee who married him piece inward Turkey or Lebanon, in addition to the children of that dyad born inward such countries, would at i time go defined equally ‘family members’.

The rules on assessment of asylum applications volition go extended to include refugees resettled direct from non-EU countries, assuming that a split upward proposal on resettlement is agreed. It volition at i time go mandatory, non optional, for the original burden of proof to residual upon the applicant to present why the claim for refugee or subsidiary protection status is justified; in addition to a novel clause inward the preamble volition reverberate the ECJ’s 2014 instance police push clit (discussed here) which limits the intrusiveness of Member States’ questioning of the credibility of LGBTI asylum-seekers.  

Next, the novel police push clit volition harmonise the job of an exception to the rules – and lower the standards of protection. While the Regulation volition retain the notion of an application for refugee or subsidiary protection status ‘sur place’ – important the asylum seeker left the allegedly dangerous province of source before it became dangerous – the exception to this dominion volition go mandatory. At present, this exception gives Member US an pick to ‘normally’ reject refugee status to an asylum seeker who has made a repeat application for asylum in addition to created her ain gamble of persecution due to her activities afterwards leaving the province of origin. The Commission proposal would extend this to subsidiary protection applications, in addition to Member US wishing to go farther – extending the (now mandatory) exception to initial applications equally well, discipline to a novel threshold (the asylum-seeker’s activities were for the ‘sole or original purpose’ of making a claim for protection). For its part, the EP would go on the exception optional in addition to limited to repeat applications, piece besides adding a safeguard for those asylum-seekers who (for example) ‘come out’ afterwards arriving inward the EU, having been previously afraid to limited their sexuality.

Similarly, the pick to reject claims because the asylum seeker had an ‘internal flying alternative’ – ie he could possess got fled to a rubber business office of the province of origin, similar a supposed ‘safe zone’ inward Syrian Arab Republic – would go mandatory. (The possibility of rejecting a claim because an asylum seeker would arguably possess got been rubber inward a different province is the discipline of other proposals). The proposal makes this discipline to safeguards: to a greater extent than elaborate explanation of the heart of the idea; applying the original rules on qualification first; shifting the burden of proof to the authorities; in addition to non requiring the asylum seeker to present that he exhausted all possibilities to displace within the province of origin. However, the Member States’ seat would drib the latter 2 safeguards. For its part, the EP would go on this clause optional, drib the ‘sequencing’ rule, but add together farther safeguards.

Definition of ‘refugee’

The European Union is jump past times the Treaties to follow the United Nations Refugee Convention, thus the proposed police push clit retains the basic thought from that Convention that a ‘refugee’ is someone persecuted because of their race, religion, political opinion, nationality or especial social group, elaborating upon each of these concepts. The Commission proposal would clarify inward the preamble that LGBT people tin shape business office of a ‘particular social group’ (confirming ECJ case law), piece the original text would confirm instance police push clit that asylum seekers can’t go expected to enshroud (for instance) their sexuality or religion inward their countries of origin. The proposal would besides tighten the definition of ‘particular social group’ inward that asylum-seekers would possess got to present inward all Member US that they both perceived themselves equally business office of a distinct grouping and were perceived equally dissimilar past times the residual of society. This would quash the discretion that Member US at i time possess got to laid higher standards, thus that alone one of those elements is necessary to evidence refugee status. Member US concur amongst this latter change, but the EP is resisting it.

As for exclusion from refugee status, where the electrical flow Directive elaborates a picayune on the relevant provisions of the Refugee Convention, the novel Regulation would enshrine the basic elements of ECJ instance police push clit on the special status of around Palestinians (Bolbol in addition to El Kott), in addition to on the exclusion of persons strongly linked to terrorism (B in addition to D; the preamble Member States’ version besides takes concern human relationship of the recent ECJ judgment inward Lounani on the exclusion of unusual fighters, discussed proposal on resettlement is agreed. It volition at i time go mandatory, non optional, for the original burden of proof to residual upon the applicant to present why the claim for refugee or subsidiary protection status is justified; in addition to a novel clause inward the preamble volition reverberate the ECJ’s 2014 instance police push clit (discussed here).

In contrast, the proposals on withdrawal of refugee status would tighten the existing law, making withdrawal mandatory inward to a greater extent than cases in addition to clarifying the link amongst similar provisions inward the residual of the police push clit (on that point, consider the ECJ’s T judgment, discussed proposal on resettlement is agreed. It volition at i time go mandatory, non optional, for the original burden of proof to residual upon the applicant to present why the claim for refugee or subsidiary protection status is justified; in addition to a novel clause inward the preamble volition reverberate the ECJ’s 2014 instance police push clit (discussed here). There would go a grace menstruum to apply for around other legal status in addition to a mandatory review of status at to the lowest degree the start fourth dimension a refugee’s residence permit came upward for renewal. However, Member US reject the latter ideas (and the EP besides rejects the review clause).

Definition of subsidiary protection

The core definition of subsidiary protection (a threat of serious impairment deriving from the overstep away penalty, torture or similar treatment, or facing a specified threat from armed conflict) would non go affected past times the 2016 proposal – although the preamble would entrench the relevant ECJ instance police push clit (Elgafaji in addition to Diakité). However, the rules on exclusion from in addition to withdrawal of subsidiary protection status would go amended to (for the close part) represent the parallel changes related to refugee status; in addition to the Council in addition to EP bring a comparable view of these proposals. On i distinct betoken – withdrawing subsidiary protection status due to less serious crimes – the Member US reject the Commission’s proposal to brand this the world mandatory, preferring to leave of absence it optional for Member States.

Content of status

The 2016 proposal would brand a number of interesting changes inward this area. First of all, the Commission’s ambitious endeavour to overturn the ECJ judgment inward T, in addition to brand all benefits for refugees in addition to persons amongst subsidiary protection contingent upon getting a residence permit, has been rejected past times Member US in addition to the EP.

Secondly, an amendment inward the contrary direction: the household unit of measurement members of refugees or persons amongst subsidiary protection who don’t qualify themselves for international protection would go entitled to a residence permit. This would supersede an ambiguous reference inward the electrical flow police push clit to preserving ‘family unity’. However, at that topographic point are already special rules concerning the admission of household unit of measurement members of refugees laid out inward the EU’s family reunion Directive. So practise 2 novel sets of rules conflict? No, because a clause inward the preamble to the agreed Qualification Regulation says that the household unit of measurement reunion Directive applies inward the trial of overlap (ie if the household unit of measurement fellow member is ‘within the scope’ of the Directive).

Usually, the 2 laws volition non overlap, for several reasons. A) the household unit of measurement reunion Directive does non apply to household unit of measurement reunion amongst sponsors amongst subsidiary protection, at to the lowest degree if that protection was granted on the ground of national or international police push clit (sponsors amongst subsidiary protection on the ground of EU law are non expressly excluded, however). B) that Directive inward regulation alone applies to household unit of measurement members who are outside the territory, whereas the Regulation conversely volition alone apply to household unit of measurement members who are present on the territory. However, Member US possess got an pick to apply the Directive where household unit of measurement members are already present; alone inward that instance would at that topographic point go an overlap, decided inward favour of the Directive where the household unit of measurement members are within the range of it.

Thirdly, the Commission aimed for to a greater extent than harmonisation of the rules on renewal of residence permits, although the Member US prefer to leave of absence themselves amongst to a greater extent than flexibility. It volition go expressly mandatory to job the EU’s criterion residence permit format for refugees in addition to others covered past times the Regulation though.

Fourthly, at that topographic point volition besides go to a greater extent than harmonisation of the rules related to go documents, which are issued past times Member US to beneficiaries of international protection inward identify of passports, given that it would in all probability go dangerous for them to contact officials from their province of origin. They volition go valid for at to the lowest degree i twelvemonth in addition to volition go expressly discipline to the EU’s passport safety rules.

Fifthly, the provisions on motility within the territory in addition to benefits would go redrafted, to bring concern human relationship of the ECJ instance police push clit inward Alo in addition to Osso (discussed proposal on resettlement is agreed. It volition at i time go mandatory, non optional, for the original burden of proof to residual upon the applicant to present why the claim for refugee or subsidiary protection status is justified; in addition to a novel clause inward the preamble volition reverberate the ECJ’s 2014 instance police push clit (discussed here), which permits a link betwixt limiting movements in addition to the grant of benefits inward around cases.

Sixthly, the rules on access to job are strengthened past times an obligation to ensure equal handling equally regards work-related matters, including taking concern human relationship of sense inward an trouble obtained exterior the province of refuge.

Finally, at that topographic point are farther changes designed to entrench command over beneficiaries of international protection: Member US may brand integration measures compulsory, in addition to whatever unauthorised motility betwixt Member US tin go punished past times ‘resetting the clock’ on acquisition of long-term residence status nether the relevant European Union law. Both Member US in addition to the EP aim to soften these proposals past times ensuring that integration courses are accessible in addition to past times allowing Member US to brand exceptions from the changes to the long-term residence rule.

Assessment

What impact volition the agreed proposal (still discipline to farther negotiation) possess got on the perceived ‘refugee crisis’? Will it run across the objectives of deterring protection-related migration equally good equally secondary movements, piece harmonising national police push clit further?

Certainly at that topographic point are important steps towards harmonisation: the job of a Regulation; the removal of the correct to laid to a greater extent than favourable standards; the disappearance of many options; in addition to the integration of relevant ECJ instance police push clit into the legislative text (making it to a greater extent than visible for national authorities, courts, in addition to legal advisers). However, the European Parliament is soundless battling to go on around fundamental rules optional, rather than mandatory.

This goes to the minute point: volition the novel Regulation cut down standards equally much equally the Commission had hoped? Here, the termination is a mixed bag: around of the changes inward the definition of refugee volition possess got that effect – unless the European Parliament successfully resists them. However, the thought of mandatory reviews of status has been dropped.

As for sanctioning secondary movements, the reset of the clock equally regards obtaining long-term residence status powerfulness possess got around impact, although the original thrust of the planned sanctions against secondary motility are found inward split upward proposals for amendment of other asylum laws.

The deferral (at to the lowest degree past times Member States) of the impact of the novel police push clit for 2 years way that the novel police push clit would (if this delay is accepted) possess got no immediate impact on the electrical flow perceived crisis. However, the changes it would brand to the definition of refugee status may atomic number 82 to fewer refugees existence recognised – although i time to a greater extent than this is discipline to the success or failure of the EP’s attempts to resist such changes. In whatever event, since many of the plans to deter both the initial in addition to secondary motility of people arguably needing international protection look inward other 2016 proposals (on reception conditions, the Dublin organisation in addition to procedural rules), the overall assessment of whether the European Union is moving inward a dramatically to a greater extent than restrictive administration equally regards asylum police push clit depends to a greater extent than upon what happens amongst those proposals over the months to come.

Barnard & Peers: chapter 26

JHA4: chapter I:5

Photo credit: Pinterest

*Disclaimer: I was an independent adviser for a consultancy advising the European Commission on the implementation of in addition to possible amendment of the electrical flow Directive.

Share this post