Dual Citizens Too Eu Citizenship: Clarification From The Ecj
May 22, 2018
Edit
Professor Steve Peers
One of the basic rules of European Union costless motility police is that inward regulation it tin exclusively endure invoked past times European Union citizens who are inward a Member State other than their Member State of nationality. As a corollary, those European Union citizens who are inward the Member State of which they are a national cannot invoke costless motility police – although ECJ illustration police inward roughly cases allows them to claim rights on the footing of their EU citizenship instead.
So what happens if individual is a citizen of two Member States? If they are living inward 1 of those 2 States, at get-go sight they are Schrodinger’s European Union citizen: simultaneously entitled to costless motility rights (as they are inward a Member State other than their Member State of nationality) as well as not entitled to those rights (as they are inward the Member State of which they are a national). In its 2011 judgment inward McCarthy, the ECJ ruled that a dual citizen of 2 Member United States of America (the Great Britain as well as Ireland) who had non moved from the Great Britain could non claim rights based on costless motility police or European Union citizenship. But did that finding residue on the mere fact that Ms McCarthy was a dual citizen of 2 Member United States of America – or rather upon the fact that she was a dual citizen who had non moved betwixt Member States?
Yesterday’s ECJ judgment inward Lounes has clarified this of import point. (On the background to the ruling, meet Alina Tryfonidou’s analysis). It concerned a Castilian citizen who moved to the UK, who so gained Great Britain nationality as well as married a non-EU citizen. She invoked costless motility rights so that he could remain amongst her, but the Great Britain government, having changed its police later the McCarthy ruling, argued that she was bailiwick non to European Union law, but to the to a greater extent than restrictive menage unit of measurement reunion rules applicable to Great Britain citizens.
The ECJ ruled that she was non entitled to invoke the costless motility rights (including the menage unit of measurement reunion rules) inward the EU citizens’ Directive, since she was directly a Great Britain citizen inward the UK. However, the Court said that she could invoke her European Union citizenship based on the Treaties: for that role she was all the same regarded every bit a Castilian citizen who had moved inside the EU. While the Treaty citizenship provisions, different the citizens’ Directive, comprise no specific rules on menage unit of measurement members, the Court said that she should endure treated no less favourably than those covered past times the Directive, every bit it would endure unjust to process her worse than a Castilian citizen who had moved to the Great Britain as well as not acquired Great Britain nationality.
In effect, dual citizens of 2 Member United States of America who displace inside the European Union hence shape roughly other exception to the dominion that European Union citizens cannot claim costless motility or citizenship rights against their Member State of nationality. They join: European Union citizens who displace to roughly other Member State as well as furnish domicile (Surinder Singh); European Union citizens who alive inward their State of nationality but who accept upwards economical action exterior it (Carpenter); as well as European Union citizens who alive inward their State of nationality but would endure compelled to leave of absence the European Union if their non-EU parent is expelled (Ruiz Zambrano). (The ECJ most of late clarified the condition of the get-go 2 categories inward 2 2014 rulings, which Chiara Berneri discussed here; as well as it most of late clarified Ruiz Zambrano cases inward a limit 2017 ruling, which I discussed here).
Comments
The Court’s ruling inward Lounes raises several questions. First of all, does it apply exclusively where the European Union citizen acquired the minute nationality later moving to that minute Member State? At get-go sight, the Court’s ruling suggests this. But it would endure strange to deny the same rights to those who gained the minute nationality earlier, upon wedlock to a national of that minute Member State, or to those who own got had 2 nationalities since birth, for instance because: their parents own got different nationalities; or they were born inward 1 Member State but 1 or both parents is a national of roughly other Member State; or they obtained both Great Britain as well as Irish Gaelic nationality because they were born inward Northern Ireland. Of course, inward each of those scenarios, the dual citizen would all the same necessitate to displace inside the European Union to invoke the European Union citizenship rights.
What most those who lost the citizenship of 1 Member State when they acquired the nationality of roughly other one? The before illustration of Scholz suggests that they, too, proceed rights – although that illustration was decided on costless motility rather than citizenship rights.
For dual citizens covered past times Lounes, produce all the rights derived from the citizens’ directive apply past times analogy? Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 item number arises amongst acquiring permanent residence, where the Court previously suggested inward Alarape that exclusively those covered past times the citizens’ Directive every bit such could compass permanent residence. (While gaining permanent residence would endure irrelevant to Ms. Lounes every bit a citizen of the UK, it would endure of import to institute whether her non-EU hubby could obtain that status). But that illustration concerned a comparing betwixt those covered past times the European Union citizens’ Directive as well as those covered past times a separate Regulation, non those covered past times the Treaties. And inward Lounes, the Court insisted upon the citizens’ Directive applying past times analogy. So it is arguable that the permanent residence rules all the same apply. (See also the declaration on this made inward the Free Movement blog).
Finally, what happens later Brexit, for dual citizens of the Great Britain as well as roughly other Member State? For those who moved before Brexit Day, it volition endure of import to ascertain whether the withdrawal understanding (if at that topographic point is one) fully guarantees the continuation of ECJ illustration police on this issue, given that menage unit of measurement reunion is all the same a disputed number betwixt the Great Britain as well as EU27 sides. For those who larn inward inside a transition menstruation (if 1 is agreed), the number volition endure whether the withdrawal understanding also guarantees the amount application of European Union laws as well as illustration police to them. For those who larn inward later that transition menstruation ends, the number volition endure whether the Great Britain has made whatever commitments at all on this issue, or whether Great Britain police exclusively volition apply – inward which illustration to a greater extent than restrictive menage unit of measurement reunion rules volition apply. If at that topographic point is no bargain on this number betwixt the Great Britain as well as EU27, so the UK’s to a greater extent than restrictive rules volition apply – unless those rules alter every bit a trial of an election that mightiness so follow. (Note that Great Britain citizens living inward Kingdom of Spain cannot obtain Castilian nationality at present).
Those who own got 2 nationalities already, as well as who autumn inward honey amongst individual who has a 3rd nationality, inevitably convey out the greatest tension betwixt the arid dictates of immigration police as well as the human necessitate of menage unit of measurement members to alive their lives together. It remains to endure seen whether those whom European Union police has joined together, volition endure dissever asunder past times Brexit.
JHA4: chapter I:6
Barnard & Peers: chapter 27, chapter 13
Photo credit: thinkSPAIN