Brexit: The Prime Number Government Minister Sets The Incorrect Course

Steve Peers

Today’s speech past times Prime Minister Theresa May gave a number of indications equally to the government’s intentions equally regards implementing Brexit. Overall, spell the phonation communication contained about welcome parts, it made fundamentally the wrong determination nearly the country’s future.

Welcome parts of the speech

The welcome parts of the phonation communication include the declaration that it ‘remains overwhelmingly together with compellingly inwards Britain’s national involvement that the European Union should succeed’. Indeed, whatsoever ‘unravelling’ of the Union betwixt these neighbouring states is non inwards the economical or safety interests of the UK. Her suggestions nearly what the European Union should do adjacent comprise much mutual feel – although it is doubtful that the remaining European Union is rattling interesting inwards listening to the leader of a province that is intending to leave. In particularly, her complaints nearly also much ‘uniformity’ together with non plenty ‘diversity’ volition strike about equally bizarre – coming from a province amongst opt-outs on the unmarried currency, Schengen, jurist together with habitation affairs (and previously social policy) plus a budget rebate.

The commitment to retain status for European Union citizens inwards the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland of Britain together with Northern Republic of Ireland is non new, but soundless welcome. It is disappointing all the same that in that location was no commitment to entrench their rights unilaterally, equally lately proposed past times a grouping of Leave together with Remain supporters inwards a British Future report. There could endure compromise ways to address this: publishing a draft Bill to this effect, or entrenching the rights inwards law conditional on European Union reciprocity. One tin only hope that the number volition endure addressed at an early on stage of the negotiations.

The involvement inwards continued collaboration on research, law cooperation together with unusual policy is also welcome, since the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland of Britain together with Northern Republic of Ireland soundless has articulation interests amongst other Member States inwards these fields. But it is content-free: what precisely would the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland of Britain together with Northern Republic of Ireland similar to participate in? How does this foursquare amongst her assertion that the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland of Britain together with Northern Republic of Ireland volition non endure involved amongst ‘bits’ of the EU?

Single marketplace together with customs union

The Prime Minister declared her opposition to ‘partial membership of the European Union, associate membership of the European Union, or anything that leaves us half-in, half-out.’ But in that location is no such thing equally ‘partial’ or ‘associate’ membership of the EU. May is slaying straw dragons inwards her ain imagination here.

She goes on to confirm her opposition to unmarried marketplace membership (as distinct from unmarried marketplace access) for the UK, for several reasons. It is striking that she makes no assertion that the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland of Britain together with Northern Republic of Ireland volition endure amend off out of the unmarried marketplace economically. Indeed, the IFS has estimated that the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland of Britain together with Northern Republic of Ireland volition lose 4% of gross domestic product if it leaves the unmarried marketplace without a gratis merchandise deal, due to the loss of marketplace access that this entails. While May goes on to say that she seeks a gratis merchandise deal, this is jump to entail less merchandise betwixt the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland of Britain together with Northern Republic of Ireland together with the European Union than unmarried marketplace membership, equally gratis merchandise deals do non take away equally many non-tariff barriers equally the unmarried marketplace rules.

So what are her reasons? One is command of immigration – together with gratis movement of persons is a non-negotiable status of the European Union for participation inwards the unmarried market.  Here she fails to consider that the European Economic Area (EEA) treaty includes a safeguard on gratis movement which could endure invoked inwards lodge to command it. May’s description of gratis movement includes overstated claims nearly its outcome on populace services, ignoring the impact of limited authorities funding of wellness together with instruction inwards recent years – spell she cannot select herself to refer the overall economical do goodness derived from European Union migrants.

Another is budget contributions. She rules out whatsoever budget contributions except for participation inwards private programmes. There is no consideration of whether the EEA alternative – giving coin straight to poorer European Union countries, amongst to a greater extent than command over the spending past times the contributor – would endure desirable inwards provide for increased marketplace access.

Next, in that location is the role of the ECJ. May states that unmarried marketplace membership ‘would hateful accepting a role for the European Court of Justice that would run across it soundless having direct legal potency inwards our country.’ Let’s non mince words: this is non true. The EEA states are non bailiwick to the ECJ at all, but to the separate EFTA Court. That courtroom has less jurisdiction than the ECJ, together with a large number of its rulings are non binding at all. It is only obliged to follow ECJ rulings delivered earlier 1991.

More broadly, May states that this ‘would to all intents together with purposes hateful non leaving the European Union at all.’ Again, this is non actually true. EEA members are non bailiwick to European Union rules on agriculture, unusual policy, fisheries, jurist together with habitation affairs (except via separate treaties, inwards part) or merchandise amongst non-EU countries – the rattling number which May devotes a large business office of her phonation communication to.

This brings me to a simulated dichotomy on which her phonation communication rests: that in that location is about kind of alternative to endure made betwixt European Union membership together with ‘Global Britain’. In fact, barriers to merchandise amongst non-EU countries get got been coming down, both due to European Union membership of the WTO together with due to bilateral merchandise deals betwixt the European Union together with non-EU countries. The portion of United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland of Britain together with Northern Republic of Ireland merchandise amongst non-EU countries has so been rising – equally Leavers are oft quick to betoken out. Many other European Union countries merchandise to a greater extent than that the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland of Britain together with Northern Republic of Ireland does amongst non-EU states – equally May herself pointed out finally year. So it’s non European Union membership that significantly holds dorsum merchandise amongst non-EU states.

It is truthful that within the EU’s customs union, the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland of Britain together with Northern Republic of Ireland cannot sign its ain merchandise deals amongst non-EU states. But the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland of Britain together with Northern Republic of Ireland could seek to remain inwards the unmarried marketplace (like Norway) but leave of absence the customs union. Indeed, Kingdom of Norway together with other EEA countries get got a number of their ain merchandise agreements. In effect, this would endure the best of both worlds – maintaining the maximum possible access to the EU’s internal marketplace via agency of total participation, spell simultaneously having the liberty to sign additional merchandise deals amongst non-EU countries.

She also argues that both sides inwards the plebiscite made clear it was nearly the unmarried market. But the unmarried marketplace was non on the ballot newspaper together with was non oft mentioned. When it was mentioned, about Leavers, similar Dan Hannan, expressly declared that unmarried marketplace membership would non endure affected. I retrieve good a mutual cut-and-paste declaration from Leave supporters inwards Facebook posts commencement ‘The United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland of Britain together with Northern Republic of Ireland volition non endure leaving the EEA…’. Although David Cameron stated that leaving the European Union meant leaving the unmarried market, why should anyone endure jump past times his falsehood? And why should ane claim made during the crusade endure treated equally politically binding, spell others – notably those which appeared on the side of a omnibus – are not?

As for the customs union, May proposes a ‘have your cake together with consume it’ version – a special bargain simplifying border crossings, spell beingness gratis to sign the UK’s separate international merchandise deals. Time volition tell if this thought interests the EU.

A transitional bargain

The Prime Minister accepts that the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland of Britain together with Northern Republic of Ireland cannot switch right away to a novel arrangement, but cannot select herself to back upward a transitional deal, maxim ‘[i]nstead, I desire us to get got reached an understanding nearly our futurity partnership past times the fourth dimension the 2-year Article l procedure has concluded’. Such an organisation would together with then endure phased in. This fourth dimension frame is unlikely, given that she wants a bespoke deal, involving special arrangements on customs together with comprehensive gratis trade.  So what happens if the Brexit Fairy does non deliver past times this deadline?

The role of parliament

Early on inwards the speech, May states that ‘the regulation of Parliamentary Sovereignty is the ground of our unwritten constitutional settlement’. Unfortunately, these are empty words. H5N1 Martian reading this would assume that she had gone to courtroom to attempt to ensure parliamentary involvement inwards the triggering of Article l – rather than to block it.

Furthermore, her phonation communication comes inwards house of whatsoever white newspaper or whatsoever other populace consultation on the best course of study to follow after Brexit. She ‘concedes’ that parliament volition vote on the terminal deal, but this is non much of a alternative – a gratis merchandise bargain or zilch – unless in that location is an alternative to negotiate a different bargain (not plenty time) or to remain inwards the European Union on the ground of about other plebiscite on the leave of absence price (ruled out past times the government).  In whatsoever event, it’s non a existent concession: the Great Repeal Bill, she states that it volition only endure changed ‘after total scrutiny together with proper Parliamentary debate’. This sounds prissy superficially, but falls brusk of a commitment to utilisation Acts of Parliament on key issues. Rather it sounds similar an intention to utilisation Statutory Instruments, which can’t normally endure amended past times Parliament together with are rarely blocked. Without a commitment to utilisation Acts of Parliament, her guarantee to uphold workers’ rights derived from European Union law is worth rather less than she suggests; together with in that location is no such commitment equally regards environmental law.

The devolved administrations

The Prime Minister states that ‘we volition set the preservation of our precious Union at the take in of everything nosotros do’ together with that she volition ‘strengthen our precious Union’. However, her innovation necessarily rejects the detailed suggestions of the Scottish authorities from Dec (discussed here) for the futurity EU/UK merchandise relationship.  So non only is the Scottish (and Northern Irish) public’s persuasion on the desirability of Brexit is overridden, but also the Scottish government’s afterward views on how Brexit should select house are ignored. The Scottish authorities newspaper tin hardly endure ‘considered’ if it has already been overruled.

There’s a pledge non to weaken existing powers of devolved bodies, but in that location volition sure as shooting endure battles ahead over which degree of authorities should practise powers over devolved competences returned from the EU.  Conversely, there’s no proposition of whatsoever granting whatsoever additional devolved powers, which mightiness get got been appropriate to address the patently highly divergent views of Scotland, Northern Republic of Ireland together with the residue of the UK. There’s about other pledge to hold the Common Travel Area betwixt Northern Republic of Ireland together with the Republic of Ireland, but this is content-free.

In short, there’s zilch hither to ‘strengthen’ the Union at all. Its ‘preservation’ depends exclusively upon the continued declaration that Scotland would endure worse off exterior the UK’s economical matrimony – spell simultaneously maintaining that the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland of Britain together with Northern Republic of Ireland is amend off exterior the European version of the same.

Unity together with Brexit

The Prime Minister declares that the plebiscite ‘victors get got the responsibleness to deed magnanimously’, together with the losers to select the result. But she has non shown the slightest magnanimity inwards her phonation communication today. She dismisses the arguments for staying inwards the unmarried marketplace made past times those – similar the Scottish authorities – who sought to remain inwards the European Union but who believe that unmarried marketplace membership would endure a reasonable compromise for a badly divided country.

More broadly, her emollient musical note today cannot erase the retentivity of her conference speech inwards Oct – total of sneering references to ‘citizens of the world’ together with the dreaded ‘liberal elites’ (cue the Star Wars Imperial March music). It’s a unusual ground inwards which Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson – graduate of Eton together with Balliol College – dismisses people similar me – the grandson of a miner, the boy together with stepson of mill workers – equally business office of the ‘elite’.

Still less tin her phonation communication erase the retentivity of her Lord Chancellor failing inwards her statutory duty to defend the independence of the judiciary from screeching headlines nearly the ‘Enemies of the People’. And if she actually believed inwards magnanimity inwards concrete terms, she could get got announced a unilateral determination to permit European Union citizens remain inwards the UK.

Conclusion

Some of the Prime Minister’s phonation communication is valuable – setting the right overall musical note on relations amongst the EU, implicitly rejecting the to a greater extent than harmful 'WTO-only' option, together with eschewing (hopefully genuinely) futurity derision of the 48% who took a different betoken of persuasion inwards the referendum. But ultimately she has made the wrong determination on unmarried marketplace participation, putting politics ahead of the country’s economical interests. And key parts of the phonation communication are vague, incorrect, misleading, hypocritical or fantasist. Perhaps nosotros were amend off amongst ‘Brexit agency Brexit’.

Barnard & Peers: chapter 27

Photo credit: BBC

Share this post