As Bad Every 2Nd It Gets: The White Newspaper On Brexit

Professor Steve Peers

Yesterday the U.K. authorities released its White Paper on Brexit. This tome was reluctantly extracted from the authorities afterward months of prompting, but is inward the terminate enormously disappointing: the political equivalent of a truthful cat coughing upward a hairball.  

As many had expected, the white newspaper is basically content-free. It's essentially Theresa May's recent speech communication (which I analysed here), inward some cases word-for-word, alongside a few statistics as well as graphs added. But fifty-fifty this information refers dorsum to the condition quo, as well as inward some cases is inaccurate (a graph suggested British workers teach xiv weeks’ paid vacation a year, earlier it was corrected), out-of-date (the 2011 statistics on U.K. citizens resident inward the EU), or solely partial (the migration statistics omit Irish Gaelic people inward the UK, as well as vice versa).

There’s no proper analysis of dissimilar options relating to the UK’s post-Brexit future, alongside assessments of their relative pros as well as cons. But thus at that topographic point couldn’t be: the White Paper says piddling of inwardness most the rattling existence of those options. David Allen Green has pointed out that the initial version of the document was time-stamped at most 4am, giving the potent impression it was written overnight past times an intern working to a deadline inward a student-like coffee-fuelled flurry.

Detailed comments on the White Paper

The newspaper begins alongside a collection of judgement fragments from the Prime Minister, centring on the bizarre claim that 65 meg people are “willing” Brexit, only ignoring the 48% who voted against it. By as well as large, it goes downhill from there.

Having said that, at that topographic point is a piddling flake of item on plans for the ‘Great Repeal Bill’ (previously discussed here as well as here), which volition convert existing European Union police clitoris into U.K. law. This White Paper confirms that at that topographic point volition survive a farther White Paper on that Bill. The latter Bill volition retain European Union Regulations inward U.K. law, non just European Union Directives, which are referred to implicitly (as “all laws which direct hold been made inward the UK, inward monastic enjoin to implement our obligations every bit a fellow member of the EU”).

This is an of import legal betoken because past times their nature every bit defined past times European Union law, Directives direct hold anyway been implemented every bit business office of U.K. police clitoris already. Regulations ordinarily direct hold not, as well as thus would vanish unless some steps were taken to retain them. (Regulations are to a greater extent than commonly used inward areas which European Union police clitoris has to a greater extent than fully harmonised, whereas Directives ordinarily apply inward areas where at that topographic point is less harmonisation).

Interestingly, the White Paper says that the ex-EU police clitoris should survive interpreted post-Brexit “in the same way every bit it is at the moment”. This suggests that the case-law of the European Union courts volition boot the bucket on to survive relevant, fifty-fifty though those courts are loathed past times many Brexiteers. It remains to survive seen precisely how this approach to interpretation volition survive secured exterior the EU; the most obvious road is to insert linguistic communication to this resultant inward the Great Repeal Act. There’s a weasel word which isn’t farther explained (“Generally”), as well as ii obvious questions aren’t answered: what most post-Brexit European Union representative law, as well as what most European Union legislation which is amended afterward Brexit?   

After Brexit, it volition survive upward to the U.K. to amend ex-EU law. But who volition direct hold the ability to create this? There’s a piddling flake of item most this key question. Any “significant policy change” volition survive the dependent area of an Act of Parliament, which agency that the House of Commons as well as the House of Lords volition direct hold a total fence as well as every jeopardy to tabular array amendments or block the government’s plans. There volition survive Bills on customs as well as immigration, “for example”.

But at that topographic point is also a commitment to a “programme of secondary legislation”. This refers to diverse methods of the authorities making laws, alongside limited ability of Parliament – ordinarily solely i jeopardy to examine the draft police clitoris briefly, alongside no jeopardy to amend it. The White Paper refers to this every bit “oversight”, but it’s non rattling substantial. By procedure of elimination this is how the authorities volition brand changes to other areas of ex-EU law, every bit good customs as well as immigration – environs as well as occupation law, for example. The White Paper says it wants to take away “deficiencies” inward the ex-EU laws; but i woman’s “deficiencies” are some other woman’s build clean beaches.

Next, the department on “taking control” of U.K. laws starts alongside the remarkable statement: “Whilst Parliament has remained sovereign throughout our membership of the EU, it has non ever felt similar that.” The Supreme Court’s Miller judgment indeed lately confirmed that Parliamentary sovereignty did non vanish piece the U.K. was an European Union member, since the resultant of European Union police clitoris inward the U.K. was dependent on Parliament’s conclusion to maintain the European Communities Act inward force, Parliament could direct hold insisted on blocking the domestic resultant of whatsoever European Union police clitoris past times expressly deciding to maintain Acts of Parliament conflicting alongside that European Union police clitoris inward force.

But let’s footstep dorsum from the legal details. This is an astonishing statement. One of the best-known slogans of the ‘Leave’ side inward the plebiscite was ‘take dorsum control’. Yet it’s conceded hither that nosotros already had control. The job is the feeling that nosotros didn’t direct hold it.

So...what prompted that feeling? Could it survive the consistent prevarication that European Union police clitoris is adopted past times ‘unelected bureaucrats’, which is a elementary falsehood most the nature of European Union law-making? (As discussed here, European Union laws are jointly adopted past times national ministers as well as the elected European Parliament; the U.K. votes inward favour of proposed laws over 90% of the time). Needless to say, the White Paper doesn’t refer to that fact. Rather it overstates the impact of European Union police clitoris inward the UK, past times agency of a dodgy statistic which includes ‘soft law’ (non-binding measures similar Recommendations, Communications, Reports as well as Opinions) inward the total number of European Union documents sent to Parliament.

Next, the White Paper points out correctly that at that topographic point is no demand for the European Union courts to direct hold jurisdiction over agreements betwixt the U.K. as well as the EU. Indeed, the European Union rarely asks for this alongside other countries (although the European Union courts create dominion on how such treaties should survive interpreted by the EU). I’ve ever suspected this focus on the European Union courts is a cherry herring – thus that the U.K. authorities tin give the axe declare a ‘victory’ past times resisting something that the European Union mightiness non fifty-fifty enquire for.

Moving on to devolution, the White Paper details diverse agency of talking to the devolved administrations – ignoring the elementary fact that the authorities has already ruled out next any of a number of options (discussed here) which the Scottish authorities presented inward December.

There’s a special department on Northern Ireland, listing facts but non giving whatsoever view of how reinstating edge checks betwixt the Irish Gaelic Republic as well as Northern Republic of Ireland tin give the axe survive avoided. I’ve referred earlier to Brexiteers’ apparent belief inward a ‘Brexit Fairy’ who volition magically solve all problems which Brexit mightiness create. The Irish Gaelic edge number seems to survive a job for her culturally-appropriating cousin: the Brexit Leprechaun.

In passing, this department refers to the mutual belief that the condition of Irish Gaelic citizens inward the U.K. is guaranteed past times the Ireland Act 1949. As far every bit immigration condition is concerned, this is questionable, every bit detailed here past times Professor Bernard Ryan.

Next, the White Paper deals alongside immigration, referring to “public line of piece of work most pressure level on populace services, similar schools as well as our infrastructure, specially housing, every bit good every bit placing downward pressure level on reward for people on the lowest incomes.” There’s a mysterious absence of statistics to dorsum upward these claims, perchance because they are shaky: run into this recent summary of economical literature on migration, past times Professor Jonathan Portes. But who needs evidence, when nosotros tin give the axe just poke a finger downwards Nigel Farage's throat? And if populace services are thus badly affected past times European Union migration, why no shout of the famous £350 million/week which would survive supposedly made available for the NHS?

It’s striking that this department refers to possible ‘phased implementation’ of novel rules on immigration of European Union citizens. This seems to survive the euphemism for an interim understanding alongside the European Union – which would presumably entail retaining a limited version of gratuitous displace of people for a time. The number is probable to survive a key bargaining betoken inward negotiations.

The adjacent department deals alongside existing UK/EU migrants. The authorities repeats its mantra that it wants to secure their status, but at that topographic point are no specifics on what "securing status" means. The banality of political waffle could non survive waived to suggest anything to a greater extent than concrete for millions of people worried most their future. (For detailed suggestions on this issue, run into the recent British Future report, discussed here).

Moving on to employment rights, the White Paper repeats a authorities hope to retain European Union occupation protection. But every bit I noted above, there’s no shout of safeguarding those rights past times agency of needing an Act of Parliament to amend them. As others direct hold pointed out, at that topographic point are weasel words here: “strengthening rights when it is the right choice for U.K. workers” as well as “maintain the protections as well as standards that create goodness workers” (emphases added). There’s a definite “fox inward accuse of the henhouse” vibe hither – quite literally so, if nosotros remind ourselves of cabinet government minister Liam Fox’s attitude to European Union occupation regulation.

This department includes the usual assertions most U.K. occupation police clitoris existence ameliorate than the European Union version. This is truthful inward some ways, as well as at that topographic point are some issues that European Union police clitoris has nix to create alongside (for instance, the minimum wage, which the White Paper rambles on about). Yet, every bit I beak over inward item here, at that topographic point are a number of areas where European Union representative police clitoris extended workers’ rights inward the UK: vacation pay for U.K. workers alongside fixed term contracts, who are on commission or direct hold extra allowances, to accept just i example.

Moving on, the department on trade as well as economical cooperation re-iterates the intention to sign a gratuitous merchandise cope without considering the relative advantages of staying business office of the unmarried market. There are wildly empty statements most futurity EU/UK cooperation. The authorities wants "civil judicial cooperation" to boot the bucket on alongside EU. But inward which areas? (There are full general European Union rules on civil as well as commercial judgments, but also specific rules on insolvency, recognition of divorce as well as shaver access rulings, as well as maintenance payments).

Similarly, the White Paper lists many European Union economical laws, but which would the authorities similar to remain business office of: contest law? The European Union trademark? The unitary patent? European Union information protection law? (On the latter issue, where at that topographic point is a particular jeopardy of disruption to merchandise flows if the U.K. does non retain laws nearly identical to the EU’s, run into my give-and-take here).

The give-and-take of Euratom, the atomic liberate energy treaty linked to the EU, implicitly suggests that the U.K. liberate energy manufacture would create goodness from a cooperation understanding alongside Euratom post-Brexit (see farther give-and-take here). But the authorities is unwilling to say so, due its full general paranoia most revealing its intentions. Yet fifty-fifty Homer Simpson – the world’s most famous employee of the nuclear industry, but also the dumbest – could approximate the UK’s negotiating plans here.

Equally, the White Paper supplies interesting statistics on the usefulness of European Union criminal as well as policing laws, as well as asserts the government’s continued involvement inward playing a operate inward European Union unusual as well as defense forcefulness policy. Yet again, there’s no item on what the U.K. would similar to participate in. (Some farther comments on the criminal police clitoris as well as policing issues here).  

Overall, the White Paper is largely devoid of content because the U.K. government’s line of piece of work most negotiating secrecy. While of course of study some of the government’s put needs to remain confidential, I direct hold to betoken out that treaties aren't negotiated alongside actual playing cards. They are negotiating past times tabling draft texts – as well as thus the European Union is bound to run into what the U.K. is shout for for, i time talks start.

The authorities may inward fact survive concerned most a dissimilar issue: existence embarrassed inward front end of the British public, past times shout for for things it doesn’t get. But here, it’s existence a piddling naïve. In my experience, officials from the European Union as well as its Member U.S. of A. dear to talk. And piddling birds leak a regular menstruation of European Union documents to the Statewatch website. Even if U.K. officials maintain every bit tranquillity every bit mice, the European Union side volition sing similar canaries.

Finally, the “we can’t present our cards” declaration reminds me of a rather relevant anecdote. Years ago, inward the dying days of the Soviet Union, I went on a trip to Moscow every bit a fellow member of the academy debating club. After several days there, our stomachs were rumbling from the resultant of fundamental economical planning upon the provide of edible food. So some of us took refuge for the even out inward the Canadian embassy, where at that topographic point was decent grub as well as beer. (We’d drunk…enough vodka past times that point).

Following a frenzied supper, nosotros started to play cards. We’d never played cards alongside each other before, thus didn’t know what to expect. One of my friends kept on shout for the dumbest, most basic, questions most the rules of the game. At i betoken he fifty-fifty showed i of the cards inward his mitt to all of us, shout for “So what should I create alongside this? Is it a practiced card?” Everyone laughed, as well as no i took him seriously every bit an opponent. At the terminate of the game, lo as well as behold, he had the best mitt past times far, as well as won easily. It turned out he knew the rules perfectly well, as well as his pretence of consummate ignorance had been a perfect bluff.

Well…everyone inward Great Britain had ameliorate hope that this is precisely the government’s existent Brexit strategy. The horrifying alternative is that the authorities actually is every bit dumb every bit it looks.

Barnard & Peers: chapter 27

Photo credit: Wings Over Scotland

Share this post