For Your Data Humphrys V. Winous Co. Representative Brief
April 03, 2016
Edit
Humphrys v. Winous Co. representative brief summary
133 N.E.2d 780 (1956)
CASE FACTS
Minority shareholder was non re-elected to the board of directors later on he failed to forcefulness out of his election to vote cumulatively at an annual meeting. At the meeting, the shareholders adopted a resolution amending the code of regulations as well as providing that each director, later on election at that meeting, would concord role for 3 years as well as that 3 classes of directorships were designated hence every bit to stagger the classes' terms. The shareholder hence designated the newly elected directors into classes. Minority shareholders filed a petition for declaratory judgment as well as equitable relief that was granted on grounds that the notice of the annual coming together was insufficient to let such classification at that meeting. The appellate courtroom constitute that such activeness past times the shareholders nullified the correct to cumulative voting.
DISCUSSION
On appeal, the courtroom held that Ohio Rev. Code § 1701.58 guaranteed to minority shareholders the correct of cumulative voting as well as that the notice of the coming together was proper.
CONCLUSION
The courtroom reversed the judgment of the appeals court, modified the lower court's determination amongst regard to sufficiency of the annual coming together notice, as well as affirmed the lower courtroom every bit modified.
Recommended Supplements for Corporations as well as Business Associations Law
133 N.E.2d 780 (1956)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Appellants, the directors as well as the bulk shareholders, sought review of a judgment of the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County (Ohio), which reversed a lower courtroom ruling against appellee minority shareholders past times finding that classification of directors past times an amendment of the corporate code of regulations was goose egg as well as void as well as that the resolution seeking reclassify each of the directors already elected was invalid.CASE FACTS
Minority shareholder was non re-elected to the board of directors later on he failed to forcefulness out of his election to vote cumulatively at an annual meeting. At the meeting, the shareholders adopted a resolution amending the code of regulations as well as providing that each director, later on election at that meeting, would concord role for 3 years as well as that 3 classes of directorships were designated hence every bit to stagger the classes' terms. The shareholder hence designated the newly elected directors into classes. Minority shareholders filed a petition for declaratory judgment as well as equitable relief that was granted on grounds that the notice of the annual coming together was insufficient to let such classification at that meeting. The appellate courtroom constitute that such activeness past times the shareholders nullified the correct to cumulative voting.
DISCUSSION
On appeal, the courtroom held that Ohio Rev. Code § 1701.58 guaranteed to minority shareholders the correct of cumulative voting as well as that the notice of the coming together was proper.
CONCLUSION
The courtroom reversed the judgment of the appeals court, modified the lower court's determination amongst regard to sufficiency of the annual coming together notice, as well as affirmed the lower courtroom every bit modified.
Recommended Supplements for Corporations as well as Business Associations Law