For Your Data Frontier Refining Companionship V. Kunkel’S, Inc. Representative Brief

Frontier Refining Company v. Kunkel’s, Inc. illustration brief summary
407 P.2d 39 (1965)

CASE SYNOPSIS

Defendant sought review of a judgment of the District Court, Eleventh Judicial District (Colorado), which convicted him of felonious escape.

CASE FACTS
Defendant was sentenced on ii kind out convictions of burglary, too was sentenced inwards the terra firma penitentiary for 3 to 5 years on i conviction, too for ii to 5 years on the other. The ii sentences were to function consecutively. Defendant escaped, was constitute the side past times side day, too was convicted of felonious escape. He was sentenced to a 3 to 5 yr term inwards the penitentiary to function consecutively amongst his previous sentences.

DISCUSSION

• On appeal, the courtroom affirmed. 
• The courtroom held that an activity provided for nether Colo. Rev. Stat. § 39-18-4(2) (1953) too Colo. Rev. Stat. § 105-4-6 (1953) did non constitute penalisation for the noun criminal offence interdicted past times Colo. Rev. Stat. § 40-7-53 (1963), but was rather an administrative disciplinary sanction imposed on a prisoner for breaking the rules of the prison. 
• Double endangerment for the same criminal offence was non involved. 
• The jury was justified inwards finding that defendant's position was proved, equally he offered no evidence to contradict the prosecution's case.
• Further, the proof of both convictions had materiality nether the circumstances of the case, too the trial courtroom did non abuse its discretion inwards admitting the evidence.

CONCLUSION
The courtroom affirmed the judgment of the trial court.

Recommended Supplements for Corporations too Business Associations Law

Share this post