For Your Data Bartle V. Dwelling Owners Co-Op Example Brief

Bartle v. Home Owners Co-op representative brief summary
127 N.E.2d 832 (1955)

CASE SYNOPSIS

Appellant sought review of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court (New York), which affirmed a judgment of the Supreme Court inwards favor of appellee that dismissed appellant's electrical load seeking to concur appellee liable for the contract debts of appellee's wholly owned subsidiary.

CASE FACTS
Appellant brought an activity attempting to concur appellee liable for the contract debts of appellee's wholly owned subsidiary. Lower courtroom dismissed appellant's complaint. Appellant's principal declaration on appeal was that the courts below erred inwards refusing to pierce the corporate veil of wholly owned subsidiary's corporate existence.

DISCUSSION

• The courtroom affirmed the lower court. 
• Court held that the police line permitted the incorporation of the wholly owned subsidiary for the rattling role of escaping personal liability.
• Court held that the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil was invoked to forestall fraud or to laissez passer on equity. 
• However, inwards this representative at that topographic point had been no bear witness to back upwards a finding of fraud, misrepresentation, or illegality. 
• Appellee's role inwards placing its wholly owned subsidiary into a classify corporation was clearly inside the limits of world policy. 
• Thus, courtroom affirmed the dismissal of appellant's complaint.

CONCLUSION
The courtroom affirmed the dismissal of appellant's complaint, asset appellee was non liable for the contract debts of appellee's wholly owned subsidiary.

Recommended Supplements for Corporations as well as Business Associations Law

Share this post