For Your Information Foley V. Interactive Information Corp. Example Brief
May 30, 2015
Edit
Foley v. Interactive Data Corp. case brief summary
765 P.2d 373 (1988)
CASE FACTS
Plaintiff employee alleged that accused employer wrongfully discharged him because he informed accused that his novel supervisor was nether suspicion for embezzling from or then other company. Plaintiff asserted a tort movement of activity for wrongful discharge inwards violation of populace policy, a contract claim for breach of an implied-in-fact hope to discharge for proficient movement only, as well as tortious breach of the implied covenant of proficient faith as well as fair dealing.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The courtroom affirmed that plaintiff's tort movement of activity for wrongful discharge failed as well as that tort remedies were non available for breach of an implied covenant of proficient faith as well as fair dealing. The courtroom reversed the dismissal of plaintiff 's claim for breach of an implied-in-fact contract hope to discharge alone for cause.
Recommended Supplements for Corporations as well as Business Associations Law
765 P.2d 373 (1988)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Plaintiff discharged employee appealed the judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County (California), which affirmed the trial court's judgment sustaining accused employer's demurrer without operate out to improve inwards plaintiff's adjust for compensatory as well as punitive damages for wrongful discharge.CASE FACTS
Plaintiff employee alleged that accused employer wrongfully discharged him because he informed accused that his novel supervisor was nether suspicion for embezzling from or then other company. Plaintiff asserted a tort movement of activity for wrongful discharge inwards violation of populace policy, a contract claim for breach of an implied-in-fact hope to discharge for proficient movement only, as well as tortious breach of the implied covenant of proficient faith as well as fair dealing.
DISCUSSION
- The courtroom affirmed inwards purpose as well as reversed inwards purpose the sustaining of defendant's demurrer without operate out to amend.
- The courtroom held that plaintiff's tort claim for wrongful discharge failed since no populace involvement was involved.
- The courtroom besides held that tort remedies were non available for breach of the implied covenant of proficient faith as well as fair dealing; as well as that plaintiff's movement of activity for breach of an implied-in-fact contract hope to discharge alone for proficient movement survived the statute of frauds, Cal. Civ. Code §1624 (a).
CONCLUSION
The courtroom affirmed that plaintiff's tort movement of activity for wrongful discharge failed as well as that tort remedies were non available for breach of an implied covenant of proficient faith as well as fair dealing. The courtroom reversed the dismissal of plaintiff 's claim for breach of an implied-in-fact contract hope to discharge alone for cause.
Recommended Supplements for Corporations as well as Business Associations Law