For Your Data Roman Catholic Archbishop Of San Francisco V. Sheffield Representative Brief
April 29, 2015
Edit
Roman Catholic Archbishop of San Francisco v. Sheffield case brief summary
93 Cal.Rptr. 338 (1971)
CASE FACTS
Petitioner archbishop challenged a judgment of respondent superior court, which held that petitioner was an "alter ego" of the church, the Bishop of Rome, in addition to the Holy See, asserting that denial of petitioner's motion for summary judgment inwards conform past times existent political party inwards involvement was an abuse of discretion. The existent political party inwards involvement purchased a domestic dog piece traveling inwards Switzerland from an fellowship of Catholic monks. The existent political party inwards involvement ultimately sued inwards respondent superior court, which denied petitioner's motion for summary judgment. Summary judgment was supported past times affidavits that showed petitioner was a kind corporate entity.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The courtroom issued a peremptory writ, directing the superior courtroom to teach into judgment inwards favor of petitioner archbishop. The courtroom held at that topographic point was insufficient bear witness to back upward application of the "alter ego" doctrine, every bit at that topographic point was no showing that petitioner controlled in addition to dominated the scheme alongside whom existent political party inwards involvement contracted. There was besides no showing that failure to pierce corporate veil would atomic number 82 to inequity.
Recommended Supplements for Corporations in addition to Business Associations Law
93 Cal.Rptr. 338 (1971)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Petitioner archbishop, sought a writ to review of a judgment from respondent superior courtroom (California), which held that petitioner was an "alter ego" of the church, the bishop of Rome, in addition to the Holy See. Petitioner asserted that denial of petitioner's motion for summary judgment inwards conform past times existent political party inwards involvement was an abuse of discretion.CASE FACTS
Petitioner archbishop challenged a judgment of respondent superior court, which held that petitioner was an "alter ego" of the church, the Bishop of Rome, in addition to the Holy See, asserting that denial of petitioner's motion for summary judgment inwards conform past times existent political party inwards involvement was an abuse of discretion. The existent political party inwards involvement purchased a domestic dog piece traveling inwards Switzerland from an fellowship of Catholic monks. The existent political party inwards involvement ultimately sued inwards respondent superior court, which denied petitioner's motion for summary judgment. Summary judgment was supported past times affidavits that showed petitioner was a kind corporate entity.
DISCUSSION
- On review, the courtroom issued a peremptory writ, directing the superior courtroom to teach into judgment inwards favor of petitioner.
- The courtroom held at that topographic point was no bear witness to back upward application of the "alter ego" doctrine, because at that topographic point was no showing that petitioner controlled in addition to dominated the scheme alongside whom existent political party inwards involvement contracted.
- There was besides no showing that failure to pierce corporate veil would atomic number 82 to inequity.
- Judgment was entered inwards favor of petitioner.
CONCLUSION
The courtroom issued a peremptory writ, directing the superior courtroom to teach into judgment inwards favor of petitioner archbishop. The courtroom held at that topographic point was insufficient bear witness to back upward application of the "alter ego" doctrine, every bit at that topographic point was no showing that petitioner controlled in addition to dominated the scheme alongside whom existent political party inwards involvement contracted. There was besides no showing that failure to pierce corporate veil would atomic number 82 to inequity.
Recommended Supplements for Corporations in addition to Business Associations Law