For Your Data Galloway V. United States Example Brief
February 16, 2015
Edit
Galloway v. United States illustration brief summary
319 U.S. 372 (1943)
CASE FACTS
Petitioner sued respondent to recover benefits for full too permanent disability yesteryear argue of insanity. Specifically, he claimed that the strain of active armed forces service abroad brought on an immediate change, which was the start of a mental breakdown that eventually became a full too permanent disability. The lawsuit courtroom held that petitioner's prove was legally insufficient to sustain a verdict inward his favor; it hence granted respondent's displace for a directed verdict. The lower courtroom affirmed.
DISCUSSION
The Court affirmed, belongings that the lawsuit courtroom was entitled to grant respondent's displace for a directed verdict inward lite of petitioner's failure to demonstrate his whereabouts, activities, or status for v years of the fourth dimension menses that he claimed to accept suffered continuing too full disability.
Recommended Supplements for Civil Procedure
319 U.S. 372 (1943)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Seeking benefits for full too permanent disability nether a contract of state of war guide chances insurance, petitioner appealed a judgment of the the States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which affirmed the lawsuit court's determination to grant a directed verdict inward favor of respondent United States.CASE FACTS
Petitioner sued respondent to recover benefits for full too permanent disability yesteryear argue of insanity. Specifically, he claimed that the strain of active armed forces service abroad brought on an immediate change, which was the start of a mental breakdown that eventually became a full too permanent disability. The lawsuit courtroom held that petitioner's prove was legally insufficient to sustain a verdict inward his favor; it hence granted respondent's displace for a directed verdict. The lower courtroom affirmed.
DISCUSSION
- The the States Supreme Court reviewed the prove too concluded that petitioner had non met his burden of showing continuous disability. In particular, it pointed to the fact that he had non submitted prove relating to a five-year period.
- Concluding that the prove of insanity was but speculative, the Court affirmed the judgment of the lower court.
The Court affirmed, belongings that the lawsuit courtroom was entitled to grant respondent's displace for a directed verdict inward lite of petitioner's failure to demonstrate his whereabouts, activities, or status for v years of the fourth dimension menses that he claimed to accept suffered continuing too full disability.
Recommended Supplements for Civil Procedure