For Your Data Jones V. Country Representative Brief
March 02, 2010
Edit
- Jones v. State (Ind. 1997) – Attempted murder requires a specific intent to kill, exactly it is sufficient for murder that accused engages inwards deport knowing of a high probability that inwards doing as well as then he volition kill someone.
- ∆ claims that he had to intent to kill, exclusively to rape
- There is no at in i lawsuit show showing purpose. Can you lot infer purpose???
- State v Raines- homo shot through the driver side window of a motorcar as well as killed the driver. Intent to kill shown through exercise of deadly weapon.
- What is the divergence b/w Raines as well as Smallwood?
- Pure probability of resulting expiry
- Death is rattling immediate
- Existence of a plausible ulterior motive
- Smallwood raped the women inwards gild to bring sexual practice w/ them as well as non necessarily to kill them
- If the women had died he would at to the lowest degree last guilty of reckless homicide or depraved middle murder.
- Recklessness rather than negligence b/c he knew of his status
- If transmission rates are extremely high you lot could brand the claim that he could encounter the “knowledge” requirement.
- Specific Intent Crime- (attempted purposeful murder) you lot create it specifically to kill someone
- Why can’t you lot bring attempted “knowledgeable”, “recklessness”, or “negligent” murder???
- Would you lot actually prosecute every drunkard driver every bit a attempted negligent murderer?
- Nope
- We create ii things when nosotros punish reverberate the badness of the thespian as well as reverberate the social harm
- What if you lot shot at soul as well as miss i could struggle that they weren’t fifty-fifty trying to kill them