For Your Data Democracy V. Feinberg Example Brief

 

• Commonwealth v Feinberg- he sold industrial delineate sterno knowing that people were inclined to gulp it to operate high. There was an extreme warning. He sold only about cans as well as V drank them as well as died. ∆ held liable for manslaughter.
  • V acted on their on testament as well as consented to gulp the sterno.
  • The fact that they bought as well as drank the sterno showed that they were addicts. Should that brand a difference? How virtually the fact that they were poor?
    • Would it affair if he had never sold sterno before? The addicts mightiness bring idea that they novel sterno was the same equally what he sold before….
• Russian roulette cases- does it affair who was inwards the room or who held the gun, as well as how does it contrast w/ drag racing cases where if your partner dies it is non homicide….

Share this post