For Your Data Neuman V. Grandview At Emerald Hills, Inc. Instance Brief
February 06, 2002
Edit
Neuman v. Grandview at Emerald Hills, Inc. instance brief summary
861 So. 2nd 494 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
CASE FACTS
Several condominium unit of measurement owners reserved the auditorium on Sabbatum mornings for what they claimed was a party, although they truly conducted religious services. Other unit of measurement owners objected, in addition to afterwards a meeting, the condominium board of directors amended the auditorium role dominion to render that no religious services could endure held inwards the auditorium or inwards whatever other mutual elements. The members filed accommodate in addition to a temporary injunction was granted equally to using the auditorium for religious activities of whatever kind, only denied equally to belongings services there. The board so amended the dominion to solely prohibit belongings religious services inwards the auditorium. The lawsuit courtroom denied a permanent injunction equally to the services prohibition in addition to denied the members' displace for rehearing, in addition to they appealed.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The courtroom affirmed the lawsuit court's determination denying the displace for rehearing.
Recommended Supplements in addition to Study Aids for Property Law
861 So. 2nd 494 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Appellant condominium association members sought review from an guild of the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County (Florida), which denied their displace for rehearing inwards their activeness against appellee condominium association, alleging that the association's dominion banning religious services inwards the condominium auditorium violated Fla. Stat. ch. 718.123 (2002).CASE FACTS
Several condominium unit of measurement owners reserved the auditorium on Sabbatum mornings for what they claimed was a party, although they truly conducted religious services. Other unit of measurement owners objected, in addition to afterwards a meeting, the condominium board of directors amended the auditorium role dominion to render that no religious services could endure held inwards the auditorium or inwards whatever other mutual elements. The members filed accommodate in addition to a temporary injunction was granted equally to using the auditorium for religious activities of whatever kind, only denied equally to belongings services there. The board so amended the dominion to solely prohibit belongings religious services inwards the auditorium. The lawsuit courtroom denied a permanent injunction equally to the services prohibition in addition to denied the members' displace for rehearing, in addition to they appealed.
DISCUSSION
- The courtroom withdrew its prior persuasion in addition to substituted the mo one, belongings that the condominium board's rules were reasonable in addition to thus non violative of Fla. Stat. ch. 718.123.
- The courtroom noted that at that topographic point was no peaceful assembly violation, equally it was non a categorical ban of the members' correct to role the auditorium for whatever gathering.
CONCLUSION
The courtroom affirmed the lawsuit court's determination denying the displace for rehearing.
Recommended Supplements in addition to Study Aids for Property Law